• Home
    • Photo Archives 2021-2022
    • Photo Archives 2020
    • Photo Archive 2019
    • Photo Archive 2018 - >
      • Photo Archives 04/01/17 >
        • Photo Archives 06/01/16 - 10/31/16
        • Photo Archive 09/01/2015 - 01/31/2016
        • Photo Archive 01/01/15
        • Photo Archive 8/01/14 - 12/31/14
        • Photo Archive 4/02/14 - 7/31/14
        • Photo Archive 11/24/13-04/01/14
        • Photo Archive 10/01/2013
        • Photo Archive 02/01/2016 - 05/31/2016
      • Photo Archive 11/03/16 -
    • EVENTS & BOOK SIGNINGS
  • About the Author
    • Contact us
    • FAQ
  • Buy the books
    • Book 2 Preview
  • Blog
  • About the book
    • Locales in the book
    • Allied Naval Forces >
      • Pacific Fleet
      • Atlantic Fleet
    • Allied Ground Forces
    • Allied Air Forces
    • Strategic Reserves
Michael S. Pauley, Author

ZERO TOLERANCE & 1940's FOREIGN POLICY

3/17/2014

0 Comments

 
My posting last week about pocket knives garnered some lively debate among several of my friends. One friend made a good point about how despite our penchant to engage in human nature, he was holding out hope that we could achieve a greater consciousness that did not include such behavior. Now that is a gross paraphrase of his statement, but here was my response: 

Hope does little to stop aggression, and while we can always hope for peace, you’d better have something more than hope to back you up. If you denude your defense capability, then you lose the option of using something other than a nuclear weapon as your only back up option. I think my point is that if you reduce your conventional forces, in the hope of finding that utopian global society, or worse yet, leveraging your defense ability to pay for enabling social programs, then you are more likely than not going to have some stone age SOB in your face with a knife. Trust me, I’ve been shot at more than once, and there is nothing romantic about it. Instead, I just think that Theodore Roosevelt had the right idea, “walk softly and carry a big stick.” My concern is that we’re giving away our stick, while we cling to the hope that people won’t behave like people. Right now, Putin is just such a person, but he isn’t the really the point, since there will always be a Putin, or a Kim Jong Un, or a Stalin, or a Hitler, or a Pol Pot, etc. I am an advocate of a strong defense as a deterrent, and you have to maintain it, otherwise, the other guy will hit you when you’re unable to fight back. Russia and China both have increased modernization and funding for defense, and while they haven’t caught up to our technology yet, their sheer numbers are enough of a threat to offset most if not all of the latest technology. So, while we downsize, they are moving in the other direction. 

Not included in that response is my simple belief that it is the lesson that comes from a “zero tolerance” policy. Just as we now have “zero tolerance” in schools, with the inclusion of nuclear weapons into the “warfare” equation, we have eliminated the simple, more basic options that we as humans will naturally gravitate toward. Against this backdrop, everyone immediately assumes that with zero tolerance, there will be no fights, and therefore nothing to escalate into greater violence. I think the last 20 years of that social experiment has shown that it “ain’t working.” Now we just have people bringing larger items to the table, in order to inflict a greater harm, that is basically spawned from the suppression of human nature. An old adage in the Army was that “Stress is created from the suppression of the desire to choke the living *&#$! out of the person who is annoying you.” When we aren’t allowed to express our anger, then it becomes a bottled up rage, and rage never leads to anything good. Granted this is at the base individual level, but it begs the question of how nations will act or react in a given situation. 

With the advent of Nuclear Weapons, Nation States are now relegated into a “zero tolerance” position. If backed into a corner, can any nation that possesses them not actually use them for their basic survival? Sure, the smarter nations know that such use would ultimately destroy themselves, and thus the argument would be that even if survival was on the line, then why use them? This is great, except that we can’t always count on that concept. The days of Mutually Assured Destruction are now gone, and were gone the second that a rogue state or potential non-state actor might now be part of the mix. Having said this, there is more to the story. 

Just as the individual suppresses his anger, the normal nationalistic divides among nations, as well as the usual ethnic, religious, and other factors, can all create a “national rage.” We’re seeing it around the globe, and it is a dangerous path, since such actions can bleed into everyone’s national and personal interests in a blink of an eye. We are playing with fire, which is why it is necessary that we keep our powder dry and secure. The deterrence through strength is about the only option we have left, since the alternative is that one nation will back another one into a corner, from which they will then bring their “gun” to school. I’m pretty sure that any alleged parity among nations will be far more dangerous for that very reason. Just food for thought, as we draw down our military to a strength level consistent with 1940. (Which, by the way, wasn’t a very good year for any nation state.) ~ Michael S. Pauley 

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Michael S. Pauley is a Navy brat and an old soldier who served in all three components of the United States Army. Living in Lexington, South Carolina, Michael is now a practicing attorney and member of the United States Naval Institute and the American Legion, Post 154, Tybee Island, Georgia.

    Archives

    June 2021
    May 2021
    December 2020
    August 2017
    January 2017
    October 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013

    Categories

    All
    Aliens
    Current News
    Day Job
    Day Job
    Events
    History
    Military
    Random Thoughts
    Sequels
    Writing

    RSS Feed

Contact us
EVENTS/BOOK SIGNINGS
FAQ
Buy the books
Site maintained by Downhill Media Group, LLC